Pelosi: House lacks votes to OK Senate health bill

Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday that she lacks the votes to quickly move the Senate’s sweeping health overhaul bill through the House, a potentially devastating blow to President Barack Obama’s signature issue.

http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=6328

Pelosi, D-Calif., made the comment to reporters after House Democrats held a closed-door meeting at which participants vented frustration with the Senate’s massive version of the legislation.


Her concession meant there was little hope for a White House-backed plan to quickly push the Senate-approved health bill through the House, followed by a separate measure making changes sought by House members, such as easing the Senate’s tax on higher-cost health plans. Such an approach would be “problematic,” she said, though Democrats haven’t completely ruled out pursuing it.


“In its present form without any changes I don’t think it’s possible to pass the Senate bill in the House,” Pelosi said, adding, “I don’t see the votes for it at this time.”


Pelosi also signaled that advancing health legislation through Congress will likely be a lengthy process — despite Democrats’ desire for a quick election-year pivot to address jobs and the economy, which polls show are the public’s top concern.


“We’re not in a big rush” on health care, Pelosi said. “Pause, reflect.”
Two days after the stunning special election in Massachusetts — where Republicans captured the Senate seat held for decades by the late Edward Kennedy — many House Democrats said one lesson was that the public wanted a more modest approach to overhauling the health care system. Several said Democrats should refocus the legislation onto popular proposals like barring insurance companies from denying coverage to sick people.


“The mega bills are dead,” said Rep. Michael Arcuri, D-N.Y. “If we didn’t see what happened Tuesday night, we have blinkers on.”


Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., said that ideally, Democrats would like to address a whole range of problems, including giving more people coverage, helping them pay for it and curbing the growth of medical costs.


“We’re obviously finding out we don’t have an ideal world, so why not deal with that which we can get done,” Serrano said.


By all accounts, Democrats have made no final decision on their options, which included breaking the health legislation into several smaller bills. But with Republican Scott Brown’s Massachusetts victory denying Democrats the 60 Senate votes they need to kill Republican delaying tactics, Obama and others were talking about legislation that would attract broad support.


“I would advise that we try to move quickly to coalesce around those elements of the package that people agree on,” Obama said Tuesday in an interview with ABC News.


“We know that we need insurance reform, that the health insurance companies are taking advantage of people. We know that we have to have some form of cost containment because if we don’t then our budgets are going to blow up. And we know that small businesses are going to need help,” he said.


In a bid for GOP support, participants suggested other elements that could be added. These included allowing insurance companies to sell policies across state lines, according to Rep. Timothy Walz, D-Minn.


Sen. John McCain rejected the idea of a slimmed-down version of the current legislation. “We are more than happy to sit down and start over,” the Arizona Republican said Thursday on CBS’ “Early Show.” “Not scale back, but start over in a true negotiating process, rather than the Democrats going back to try to pick off one or two Republicans.”


Nearly as shaken by the Massachusetts vote were health care provider groups that have supported the Democratic effort, such as drug makers, hospitals and doctors.


While few were making public statements, industry groups that stood to gain millions of newly insured customers were worried that such potential gains were in jeopardy, according to lobbyists speaking on condition of anonymity to describe confidential conversations.


Industry groups also were worried that without a health care bill, some of the savings several of them had agreed to contribute — such as lower Medicare reimbursements — might be used for separate congressional efforts this year to reduce the soaring deficit.


Underscoring their sense that the Massachusetts vote put them atop a political wave, Republicans were e-mailing fundraising solicitations on Wednesday to supporters.


“Democrats nationwide should be on notice: Voters are looking for checks-and-balances, and they are prepared to hold the party in power responsible for their reckless spending and out-of-touch agenda in Washington,” wrote Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, who heads the Senate GOP’s campaign arm.

Nanci Pelosi and Harry Reid captured as they truly are...........(Failures and traitorous criminals against the American People)

_____________________________________________________________

Big defeat for the neo-socialist assholes in washington, for once the will of the American people won out! They have lost their super-majority in the Senate and have lost their one sided leadership advantage where they were answerable to nobody but themselves. If this is an indicater of anything, it shows that many people including liberals do not like the direction this administration is taking the country, and forshadows a tough re-election year for demoncrats - especially the ones that voted yes on the healcare bill and ignored their constituents. Now the next two big fights will be Amnesty for Illegals and Cap and Trade but with the filibuster proof democratic senate broken the people stand a chance to stall this ludicrous legislation and even vote it down, that is assuming this republican senate actually decides to serve the people and defend democracy that is. Time will only tell but for the first time in a while I must say I am optimistic, and that we can save our country from the brink of destuction and reverse the damage done by this administration!


CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Networks Fail to Criticize Obama Despite Most Jobs Lost in a Year Since 1940

Reporters omit failure of stimulus, problems counting jobs created or saved from many jobs stories.

Business & Media Institute

The national unemployment rate rests at 10 percent after 85,000 more jobs were lost in December, while the number of people too discouraged to look for work increased by 642,000. CNBC's Steve Liesman called those figures "absolutely devastating."

Yet the network news media refused to hold President Barack Obama responsible for the losses since the jobs release Jan. 8. Obama has been in office for a full year and made a number of "extravagant" promises regarding job growth, yet network news reports remained uncritical with the exception of Sunday talk shows.

That's a sharp contrast to the treatment of Republican administrations' jobs data. In those cases, the networks were determined to present a negative picture - even when times were good.

Anchor Brian Williams began the Dec. 2, 2005 "Nightly News" with a strong note of caution: "Rebound: A slew of good news about jobs and the economy, but are there warning signs ahead?" That's how he prefaced a report about 215,000 new jobs.

Throughout 2005, the networks emphasized layoffs instead of the 2 million new jobs created that year under President George W. Bush. Now in 2009, Obama has presided over the most job losses in a single year since 1940 and some in the media tried to remain cheerful.

CNN's Susan Lisovicz actually cited the 4,000 jobs created in Nov. 2009 as "glimmers of hope" Jan. 8, the same day Christine Romans called 10 percent unemployment "uncomfortable for many people."

"Ten percent unemployment is just something that is not sustainable in a healthy economy. That's just the bottom line there. But the pace of job loss over the past year has slowed pretty dramatically, and frankly, Heidi, even by the month of November last year we saw some job creation," Romans said during the 10 a.m. hour.

With the exception of a single CBS mention, the networks' job reports also failed to inform their viewers that 2009 had the highest yearly job losses on record (more than 4.1 million). And when Katie Couric did address the historic nature of the job losses, she underreported the number of jobs lost in 2009 by 700,000.

Many of those network stories also failed to admit that the stimulus package hadn't created jobs. A recent Associated Press analysis of the "shovel-ready" construction part of the stimulus found almost no impact on job creation at the local level.

"The effect was so small, one economist compared it to trying to move the Empire State Building by pushing against it," AP wrote.

Obama Says Stimulus Created Jobs, Networks Fail to Contradict

Obama made grandiose claims that his $787 stimulus package would halt rising unemployment, preventing it from climbing above 8 percent. During the campaign he also promised to "save or create" 3-4 million jobs.

But even with the 10 percent unemployment rate as evidence of the stimulus' failure, many in the news media have given Obama a pass, refusing to criticize billions wasted on stimulus and some have even continued to support his plan to create jobs by spending even more taxpayer money.

Only one story on the networks reported the AP's findings about the "failure" of the $20 billion stimulus money spent on roads and bridges to create jobs.

NBC's "Today" even repeated the White House call for targeted spending on jobs. On Jan. 11, Jim Cramer supported the notion saying, "If we don't get more stimulus, we will not have more jobs."

Ironically, Cramer admitted that so far the stimulus package hadn't created jobs. The White House claimed on Jan. 12 that the stimulus had "created to saved" between 1.7 million and 2 million jobs.

But the Washington Post's Jan. 13 article about those saved or created jobs buried a very significant detail in the middle of that story: "Separately, the White House has announced a change in the way those reports tally jobs, a response to critics that could make the reports more reliable but make it more difficult to gauge the stimulus's impact over time."

Where's the outrage over this change in accounting methods? Certainly the networks wouldn't have put up with this under the Bush or Reagan administrations.

AP reported that it is "impossible to quantify exactly what effect the stimulus has had on job creation." So the administration can claim it created or saved any number of jobs because there will be no way to prove or disprove it.

Just counting the jobs is becoming a challenge according to AP, which said: "Those who receive stimulus money can now credit jobs to the program even if they were never in jeopardy of being lost, according to new rules outlined by the White House's Office of Management and Budget."

Downplaying the 'Bad News'

Although the networks were somewhat downbeat using terms like "disappointed" and "less than stellar" after the jobs report came out Jan. 8, most reporters did not portray 10 percent unemployment as a terrible tragedy.

Only one report mentioned that over a half million people were so discouraged in December they dropped out of the workforce, while several mentioned the 17.3 percent "real unemployment" rate.

NBC's Savannah Guthrie reported Jan. 8 "they [White House] tried to put the best face on it here, but there's no question this unemployment report is a disappointment."

"Disappointment" understated the pain felt by many as 4.1 million jobs disappeared during Obama's first year in office.

In 1982, when unemployment was slightly lower the networks quoted vicious political attacks on Ronald Reagan and showed footage of people living out of trucks under a bridge.

Network reports showed desperation, sadness and tragedy as a result of rising joblessness in 1982. NBC pictured lines of people waiting outside a food bank and interviewed crisis counselors in Seattle on May 7.

"More callers talk of despair and even suicide," Don Oliver reported that night, before interviewing Jim and Pam Smalls. Oliver called them "victims of unemployment depression and anger," because Pam had to seek help from a battered woman's shelter.

Nothing like that appeared in the network jobs reports following the Jan. 8 release. In fact, during 2009 the networks found a man "doing backflips" after he was rehired by his company.

Journalists on ABC, CBS and NBC constantly praised Obama for trying to stop rising unemployment in 2009, even as he failed. Month after month they tried to find the "good news" or signs of a turnaround.

The networks have been talking about the economic recovery, but even the economy is recovering as the White House and some journalists claim, it may not feel like one to many people.

According to BusinessWeek, the "misery index" (the sum of unemployment and inflation rates) is at 11.8 percent. That is the highest since May 1991.

"The last time the U.S. misery index was this high, in the early 1990s, gains in consumer prices accounted for almost half its reading. Today inflation makes up less than a fifth of the measure," BusinessWeek wrote.

===================

Julia A. Seymour is an assistant editor/analyst for the Business & Media Institute.

She edits daily stories, writes trend pieces for BMI's weekly newsletter, The Balance Sheet, and has co-written Special Reports including Debt: Who'$ Responsible?, Global Warming Censored and UnCritical Condition. Seymour has appeared on Fox Business Network, the Christian Broadcasting Network and has been a guest on the G. Gordon Liddy Show.

She has also done over a hundred interviews on a wide-range of topics with radio stations in 23 states as well as nationally syndicated programs.

Her work has appeared or been mentioned by radio host Mark Levin, The Drudge Report, WorldNetDaily, USA Today, CNBC.com, MSNBC's Motley Fool and "Ted, White and Blue" by Ted Nugent. Prior to joining BMI in 2006, she was a staff writer for Accuracy in Academia where she wrote daily articles about bias in lower and higher education and contributed to the book "The Real MLA Stylebook." She holds a B.S. in Mass Communications: Print Journalism from Liberty University. Seymour lives in Northern Virginia.

The main reason why the media fails to critisize Obama is on account of his race, political corectness has this country by the balls! Also because the Democratic Liberal Media would look foolish critisizing it's own party while it holds power. It's much easier for them to demonize the Republicans than engage them in any real unscripted debate!

CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Drone for Spying on Americans Rolled Out, first demo flights

Looks more and more everyday like the commander in chimp is preparing for civil unrest! Perhaps Martial Law is one of Obongo Badongo's New Year's resolutions!



Watch as arrogant police hide from and lie to the public. Watch the one member of the secret police barely open his window – then close it as reporters came over!

Remember public funds are paying this arrogant secret police-person’s salary and for the cruiser he’s driving and the window he closed on the reporter in order to hide his face!

Notice how they made up stories about FAA flight restrictions!

Great reporting. Horrible police department because their actions demonstrate an US vs. THEM mentality with regards to the public. There’s an old saying the police should remember – “don’t bite the hand that feeds you.”



Perhaps this video will show how serious the police really are about dictatorship-these are not police they are soldiers:

Reporter: “You mean shoot an American?” (Yeah that's exactly what he means!)



But, you may say, they need to protect us and confiscating weapons from the public is necessary. Wrong. Check this report on the significant drop in crime following the recent gun store shelf-emptying that followed the Obama administrations election – it shows that an armed public reduces crime. So what are they taking weapons for?

Read more FBI Reports Huge Decrease In Murders As Firearm, Ammunition And “Large” Magazine Sales Soar Here’s a snippet:

“Last week, the FBI issued its preliminary 2009 crime report, showing that the number of murders in the first half of 2009 decreased 10 percent compared to the first half of 2008. If the trend holds for the remainder of 2009, it will be the single greatest one-year decrease in the number of murders since at least 1960, the earliest year for which national data are available through the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Also, the per capita murder rate for 2009 will be 51 percent lower than the all-time high recorded in 1991, and it will be the lowest rate since 1963—a 46-year low.”

Conclusion: Anyone deceiving you with arguments that it is to your benefit, as a free citizen, to sacrifice your inalienable rights is your enemy!



CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Firecracker Incident Now Christmas “Terrorism”

http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=3033

Could this be a CIA “Designed-to-Fail” attack?

by James Buchanan

The neocons just don’t stop pushing their propaganda, not even on Christmas. Then again, Christmas isn’t exactly a big holiday for the Jews. An incident that was originally described as firecrackers on avweb.com is now being portrayed as a serious terrorist incident.

A Fox News article reports “White House: Failed Airline Bombing Was Attempted Act of Terrorism…. A male passenger reportedly linked to terrorist organization al-Qaeda ignited a powdery substance prior to landing on a Delta Airlines flight to Detroit Friday. The suspect is believed to be Nigerian…”

This sounds like another CIA-MOSSAD false flag operation, in which a disgruntled Third World Muslim is recruited to carry out an attack, which had no chance of succeeding. The Richard Reid shoe-bomber incident would be another example of this. He attempted to set off explosives built into his shoes several weeks after the 911 attack. The shoes failed to explode, but al Qaeda went back on the front page.

There is virtually no way that a loose powder explosive set off in the cabin of an airplane could penetrate the floor and explode the fuel tank which is the scenario being spun by Homeland security. Loose gun powder -for example- will burn in small quantities, but it won’t explode unless a container is packed with it. Even if it did explode, it would have the effect of a large firecracker. It would take a large container of gun power to cause a sufficiently large explosion to bring down a plane. The powder that was used has still not been revealed (and may never be revealed to prevent copycat attacks).

The original 911 attack has been described as a false flag operation by ex-Italian president Francesco Cossiga so we shouldn’t be surprised if lesser false flag attacks or designed-to-fail attacks take place too. An article on Francesco Cossiga reports “Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy’s most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies. Cossiga was elected President of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide 1985 election to become President of the country in 1985. Cossiga gained respect from opposition parties as one of a rare breed – an honest politician – and led the country for seven years until April 1992….”

Christmas didn't stop the corrupt Democrats in the Senate from voting through their Healthcare Bill Either. They tend to do alot of things the public overwhealmingly opposses in this manor or in the middle of the night. Another FALSE FLAG ATTACK, wouldn't suprise me in the least, I wouldn't put anything past this gangster administration!

CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Ten New Reasons Why Obamacare Can Still Be Killed

http://www.rightsidenews.com/201001028012/politics-and-economics/ten-new-reasons-why-obamacare-can-still-be-killed.html

1. The American people oppose Obamacare by almost 2 to 1 in the latest CNN poll. Other polls show lopsided opposition to passing either the Senate or House health-care bill.

   Public opinion is against the bill because of its obscene costs in higher taxes, burdensome debt, anti-freedom mandates, rationing, and reduced care for seniors. The American people have awakened to the fact that Obamacare is transformational legislation that will drag us against popular will into European-style Socialism.

2. The Democrats' double-counting of Obamacare's financial benefits has been exposed as a colossal lie. Harry Reid told the Senate that his bill strengthens our future by both "cutting our towering national deficit by as much as $1.3 trillion over the next 20 years" AND "strengthening Medicare and extending its life by nearly a decade."

3. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) refuted that assertion. CBO said the claim that Obamacare would provide these benefits simultaneously "would essentially double-count a large share of those savings and thus overstate the improvement in the government's fiscal position."

4. Obamacare is unconstitutional because of its mandate that all individuals must carry "approved" health insurance, and all businesses must give health insurance to their employees whether or not the company can afford it. "Universal" coverage will be enforced by the Internal Revenue Service with power to punish those who don't have such a plan.

   Constitutional lawyers point out that the Commerce Clause does not give Congress the authority to force Americans to buy health insurance as a condition of living in our country because personal health insurance is not "commerce." The CBO wrote that "a mandate requiring all individuals to purchase health insurance would be an unprecedented form of federal action"; the Supreme Court has never upheld any requirement that an individual must participate in economic activity.

5. Since the Senate bill imposes sharp limits on health-insurance companies' ability to raise fees or exclude coverage, it likely will force many of them out of business. Obamacare is unconstitutional because it violates the Bill of Rights protections against takings without just compensation and deprivation of property without due process of law.
   
   
   
6. Other Obamacare provisions blatantly legislate racial and other forms of discrimination. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights sent two letters to the President and congressional leaders warning about the obnoxious requirements for racist and sexist quotas.

   The Senate bill requires that "priority" for federal grants be given to institutions offering "preferential" admissions to minorities (race, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, and religion). Institutions training social workers, psychologists, psychiatrists, behavioral pediatricians, psychiatric nurses, and counselors will be ineligible for federal grants unless they enroll "individuals and groups from different racial, ethnic, cultural, geographic, religious, linguistic, and class backgrounds, and different genders and sexual orientations."

7. Obama's claim that "everybody" will now be covered creates few winners but lots of losers. Universal health insurance will be achieved by forcing young people to pay the additional costs (insurance for the youngest third of the population would rise by 35 percent), and by restricting and rationing care for the elderly.
   
   
   
8. According to Robert Samuelson in the Washington Post, the "wild card is immigration." From 1999 to 2008, 60 percent of the increase in the uninsured occurred among Hispanics, and Obama's refusal to close our borders will make this problem more costly every year.
   
   
   
9. Obamacare gives Medicare bureaucrats the power to ration health care by forcing doctors to prescribe cheaper medical devices and drugs. In the recent case of Hays v. Sebelius, the court ruled that Medicare doesn't have the right to make this rule, but Obamacare takes jurisdiction away from the courts to hear any appeal from decisions of the new Medicare Commission.

   The "stick" applied to primary-care doctors is imposing financial penalties if they refer too many patients to specialists. The "carrot" is financial rewards to doctors who give up small practices and consolidate into larger medical groups or become salaried employees of hospitals or other large institutions.

10. The Senate bill contains at least a dozen of what can be described as bribes. Senator Mary Landrieu received a $300 million increase in Medicaid funding for her state (known as the Second Louisiana Purchase), and Senator Ben Nelson received $100 million permanent exemption for Nebraska from the costs of Medicaid expansion.
    
    
    
11. The Senate bill even has a four-page section artfully written to enable ACORN to get federal health-care grants. This section describes grant recipients as "community and consumer-focused nonprofit groups" having "existing relationships ... with uninsured and underinsured consumers."

CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

The "Chimp in Chief" makes Top 10 list of corrupt politicians

Believes he 'can violate privacy rights of Americans' without legal consequence

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120407



Barrack Hussein Obama has been named to a "Top 10" list he'd likely be grateful to avoid: Judicial Watch's "Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians," for 2009.

"The Obama White House believes," said the report from the organization that monitors government for corruption, and sues when it chooses, "it can violate the privacy rights of American citizens without any legal consequences or accountability."

The report released yesterday said Obama joined the likes of Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass.; Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner; Attorney General Eric Holder; House Speaker Nancy Pelosi; Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.; and Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., on the list.

"Even before President Obama was sworn into office, he was interviewed by the FBI for a criminal investigation of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich's scheme to sell the president's former Senate seat to the highest bidder," the report said.

"Moreover, the Obama administration made the startling claim that the Privacy Act does not apply to the White House. The Obama White House believes it can violate the privacy rights of American citizens without any legal consequences or accountability," the report said.

"President Obama boldly proclaimed that 'transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency,' but his administration is addicted to secrecy, stonewalling far too many of Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act requests and is refusing to make public White House visitor logs as federal law requires," the organization said.

Judicial Watch also cited efforts by the Obama administration to use the National Endowment of the Arts, as well as the agency that runs the AmeriCorps program, as "propaganda machines" and use tax dollars to persuade "artists" to promote the Obama agenda.

Further, he's installed a long list of "czars" in the government.

"Too many of these individuals are leftist radicals who answer to no one but the president. And too many of the czars are not subject to Senate confirmation (which raises serious constitutional questions)," the report said.

"Under the president's bailout schemes, the federal government continues to appropriate or control – through fiat and threats – large sectors of the private economy, prompting conservative columnist George Will to write: 'The administration's central activity – the political allocation of wealth and opportunity – is not merely susceptible to corruption, it is corruption.'"

"Government-run healthcare and car companies, White House coercion, uninvestigated ACORN corruption, debasing his office to help Chicago cronies, attacks on conservative media and the private sector, unprecedented and dangerous new rights for terrorists, perks for campaign donors – this is Obama's 'ethics' record – and we haven't even gotten through the first year of his presidency," Judicial Watch said.

Chris Farrell, the chief of research for the organization, told WND the list is not just about wrongdoing – whether the actions are immoral, illegal or just fattening.

These are issues dealing with an abuse of office, or the abuse of the public trust, he said.

He said the Top Ten list is listed on the Judicial Watch website in alphabetical order because it is not intended to represent that one case among the "Top 10" would be worse than others.

"What they've done has broad repercussions," he said.

According to the report others on the list are:

* Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., who also was on the list last year for his corrupt relationship with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for allegedly accepting preferential treatment for himself. In 2009, the report said, the scandals kept coming. He faced an ethics complaint this year for undervaluing a property he owns in Ireland on his federal disclosure forms.

* Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., who might be considered one of the year's worst offenders for admitting to an extramarital affair with the wife of one of his staff members, who then allegedly obtained special favors from him in exchange for his silence. "It looks as if Ensign misused his public office (and taxpayer resources) to cover up his sexual shenanigans," Judicial Watch said.

* Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., who is being investigated by Judicial Watch in connection with a $12 million TARP cash infusion into the Boston-based OneUnited Bank. He was the congressman who infamously in 2003 announced, "the two Government Sponsored Enterprises we are talking about here, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not in a crisis." The comments came as he worked against GOP efforts to rein in the GSEs, which later created an economic tidal wave through the economy because of their financial losses.

* Another is Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, who admitted to failing to pay $34,000 taxes he owed on his lucrative salary at the International Monetary Fund.

* Attorney General Eric Holder also is on the list. His record includes obstructing an FBI investigation of the theft of nuclear secrets from Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratory; rejecting multiple requests for an independent counsel to investigate alleged fundraising abuses by then-Vice President Al Gore in the Clinton White House; undermining the criminal investigation of President Clinton by Kenneth Starr in the midst of the Lewinsky investigation; and planning the violent raid to seize then-six-year-old Elian Gonzalez at gunpoint in order to return him to Castro's Cuba, Judicial Watch said. He also has dropped a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party stemming from members' actions on Election Day 2008.

* Joining the others is Illinois State Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr., who was in the center of the scandal in which Blagojevich reportedly tried to sell Obama's vacant Senate seat. "According to the Chicago Sun-Times, emissaries for Jesse Jackson Jr., named 'Senate Candidate A' in the Blagojevich indictment, reportedly offered $1.5 million to Blagojevich during a fundraiser if he named Jackson Jr. to Obama's seat."

* Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is named for her "sense of entitlement," which is "at the heart of the corruption problem in Washington," Judicial Watch said. "Politicians believe laws and rules (even the U.S. Constitution) apply to the rest of us but not to them. Case in point: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her excessive and boorish demands for military travel. Judicial Watch obtained documents from the Pentagon in 2008 that suggest Pelosi has been treating the Air Force like her own personal airline."

* Also, Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., who "made headlines in 2009 for all the wrong reasons." Judicial Watch said Murtha is under investigation for his relationship with the now-defunct defense lobbyist PMA Group. That was founded by a former Murtha associate and has been his largest campaign contributor.

* Also, Rep. Charles Rangel, D-New York, who has been unable to explain how he forgot to pay taxes on $75,000 in rental income, or how his congressional office was able to raise funds for his private Rangel Center by reportedly swapping a tax loophole for donations. Further, he's accused of making financial donations to other members of Congress who are assigned to investigate his actions.

Ahh it couldn't happen to a more deserving scumbag!

But the corruption doesn't just stop with this President. It's all of them in the Congress and Senate as well. The whole, damned administration is corrupt - we all know this of course! We need to throw them all out, the elitists, the career politicians, the Jews, the banksters - ALL OF THEM. And then start from scratch!


CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME