Obama speech to La Raza: I wish I could be a dictator

Obama, speaking to the radical mestizo group La Raza yesterday, told them that he wished he could bypass Congress and rule the country all by himself.......at the end of the video he says: obama: "That's not how our system works"

(latino female voice from the crowd): "Change it!"




ATC Says - I love how at the beginning of the video he states "...and I know some people want me to just bypass CON-gress and change the laws on my own...." Doesn't take an Einstein to figure out who those "SOME PEOPLE" are. Just look at the faces of these illegals chanting and urging the president to become a dictator and embrace dictatorial powers. It is this racial lobby, the Illegals and the home grown latino population that the president is counting on for his re-election.



CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

GOP Rep warns Obama of impeachment if US defaults

A Republican member of the House of Representatives has declared that President Barack Obama could be impeached if the U.S. defaults on its debts.

http://www.presstv.com/usdetail/190912.html

The comment is from Rep. Steve King (R-IA), who told his followers on Twitter that they should "stop talking about" a potential U.S. default.

"The 1st dime of each $1 of revenue services debt," he wrote Monday. "Obama would be impeached if he blocked debt payments."

The comment is ironic in that Republicans have played the largest role in pushing the U.S. government to the brink of defaulting on some debts by refusing to lift the nation's debt ceiling

.

Congressional Republicans raised the ceiling nine times during the Bush administration, adding over $4 trillion to the nation's debts. President Obama, as a freshman Senator from Illinois, voted in 2006 against raising the debt ceiling, but has since called his decision a mistake of inexperience

.

Today the president and Treasury are warning that if the debt limit is not raised before August 2, the government will be forced to default on some of its debts. President Obama even warned that Social Security checks might not arrive on time, or at all, if Congress cannot secure a deal. Raw Story

FACTS & FIGURES

The U.S. constitution stipulates that only Congress can authorize the federal government to borrow money. Since 1962 Congress has raised the debt ceiling 72 separate times, including 10 times in the past decade alone. Al Jazeera

When Obama took office in January 2009 in the midst of the biggest economic turndown since the Great Depression, U.S. public debt stood at $10.6tn. This May, two and a half years later, the current debt limit of $14.3tn was reached. Al Jazeera

House Speaker John Boehner is faced with the fact that as many as 40-50 of his members oppose a debt ceiling increase on principle. Guardian

Republicans have repeatedly sidelined talks, insisting that tax increases for the wealthiest Americans and corporations are unacceptable, as are cuts to national defense. They've instead focused on plans that would eliminate Medicare, dip into the Social Security fund and dramatically reduce the government's workforce. Raw Story

The U.S. officially hit its $14.3 trillion debt ceiling on May 16, 2011. WSJ

The U.S. government could potentially default on its debts on August 2. Industry Leaders Magazine

The U.S. Treasury is borrowing $4.22 billion per day, adding to the current debt. Real Clear Politics

Congress has raised the federal debt limit 10 times over the past 10 years. National Journal

U.S. default: An impeachable offense?

As Washington's debt ceiling stalemate threatens the American economy, conservative Republicans warn of dire consequences — for President Obama

Best Opinion: No More Mister Nice Blog, American Conservative, New Republic

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) took the rhetoric in the debt ceiling debate to a new level on Monday, saying via Twitter that President Obama could be impeached if he lets the U.S. default on its debts. King said there's no reason to even suggest default is a possibility on Aug. 2, when the Treasury Department says the government will run short of money to pay its bills, because, in King's words, "the 1st dime of each $1 of revenue services debt," so while we might fall short on other financial obligations, the U.S. will always pay its debts. Rep. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) has also mentioned impeachment, should Obama raise the debt ceiling without congressional approval. Is impeachment really a possibility, or is this just wishful thinking on the part of conservative Republicans?

Let's hope the GOP tries this nonsense: "Impeachment would be a good thing," says Steve M. at No More Mister Nice Blog. Not because Obama deserves it, but because such an attack "without any semblance of an impeachable offense would smack some sense into America." It would prove once and for all that our political system isn't broken, it's "being destroyed by a specific cabal of sociopaths known as the Republican Party."
"Impeachment of the president? Would that also count as 'both sides are to blame'?"

Impeachment should be on the table: Rep. King is right, says J.D. Longstreet at American Conservative Daily. "There will be no default — unless Obama wants there to be a default." And if Obama torpedoes the economy by refusing to make debt payments or, as he has considered, raises the debt ceiling without congressional approval, he'll be putting his own political aims ahead of the American people, and the Constitution.
"Obama is in over his head ... again!"

Republicans might try impeachment, but not over this: "I'd be pretty surprised if the debt ceiling leads to impeachment," says Jonathan Chait at The New Republic. The mainstream GOP is not going to such extremes yet. But if the GOP misses its "one real chance to oust Obama — the 2012 elections — "the impeachment sentiment currently lingering around the margins [may move] toward the mainstream of the party."
"Obama impeachment watch"


ATC Says - the one real threat the Republicans fail to acknowledge or see is that because of their unwillingness to show solidarity with the Tea Party when it first began to emerge in the beginning and instead attack it the Tea Party will run on the ballot in the 2012 elections as a third party. History has shown that when this happens it tends to split the Republican vote and hand victory to the Democrats as was true with the Case of President Clinton when Perot ran against him as an independent....well we all know the outcome of that election don't we! History threatens to repeat itself once again as we are coming up on the 2012 election cycle with a growing tea party of conservatives disenchanted with the Republican Party that threaten to run candidates as a third party....if Obongo Wins re-election folks then all bets are off. Everything he has done and implemented up to this point has been carefully carried out and orchestrated because he wants to be re-elected... Once he is re-elected then he can do what he wants without fear of the polls therefore.....Impeachment may be the only legal recourse we as American citizens are left to save our country from financial oblivion and set our nation back on the correct course towards economic prosperity and growth!

This isn't the only grounds for Impeachment by far....there is another move that is calling for Obama's impeachment regarding America's Involvement in Lybia:

Bruce Fein, former Reagan administration, has introduced an article of impeachment against President Obama back in April 2011 for getting the US involved in a war in Libya without Congressional approval. Fein explains:





CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Obama Plans Pricey Birthday Bash on Default Day

As America’s poorest wait for Social Security checks that may never come on Aug. 3, President Barack Obama will be out celebrating a milestone birthday at a party where tickets cost up to $35,800 each.



http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/BarackObama-Birthday-DebtCeiling/2011/07/16/id/403823?s=al&promo_code=C9EC-1#ixzz1SmL3EW2d

Republicans are slamming the decision to have the party as “insensitive.”

“This really shows how unserious he is,” Republican Rep. Joe Walsh, a fellow Chicagoan, tells Newsmax exclusively. “I realize it’s his birthday, but he is a president who has said he doesn’t know if social security checks will go out that day.

“If that’s the case, I cannot believe he will be having a big party that very day.”

Obama said on Tuesday that he cannot guarantee that social security checks will go out from August 3 unless a deal can be reached on raising the nation’s $14.3 trillion debt limit. “There may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it,” he told CBS’ Scott Pelley.

Unless the deal is reached, government services across the board will be cut and in many cases closed down.

“My first thought was that he will have to fly to Chicago before the third because I can’t imagine airports will be open,” said Walsh. “And he’ll have to have a huge supply of candles because the lights are going to go out.

“I am amazed he will be able to have a party at all.”

Walsh said he hopes to be in Chicago on Aug. 3 himself to be with his family in case the calamity that Obama has warned about comes to fruition. “I just doubt I’ll get an invitation to the party,” he said.

Oscar winner Jennifer Hudson is expected to perform at the birthday bash at the historic Aragon Ballroom in Chicago. The event will be one of the president’s biggest fundraisers of the year. Publicity literature featuring a red, white and blue Happy Birthday logo has already been produced.

The event will be “multi-tiered,” the Chicago Sun-Times reported. The Hudson concert would cost $50; admission to the party $200; a premium seat $1,000; a souvenir photo with the president $10,000; and VIP seating and dinner with Obama $38,500.

Another GOP Congressman, Louie Gohmert of Texas was incredulous about the timing. “That’d be as crazy as setting up golf games in the middle of going after Osama bin Laden,” he said. “I’m sure he wouldn’t do something like that – or maybe he would.”

Obama has been leading contentious talks all week with leaders of both parties in the House and Senate to avoid the August 2 deadline. On Friday he warned of financial “Armageddon” if a deal cannot be reached.

ATC Says: He has done nothing but play politics with the debt ceiling and has shown his unwillingness to work with Republicans unless the deal is done his way and on his terms....He uses scare tactics to scare the sheeple and fails as a leader to take the lead on the negotiations and demands his subordinates to come up with a viable plan that he himself has not produced. For two years now, even when the democrats controlled both houses of CON-gress and the White House have failed to pass a budget of their own and it is because of that and by their very design we find ourselves down to the wire as we are! Everything this President has done to this point has shrunk job growth and swelled our deficit and Unemployment rate! It has even been accounted that he has been quoted as stating tempted to do it on his own (raise the Debt Ceiling that is) without Congressional approval by the August 2nd deadline. We can't have something as frivolous as the United States Defaulting on its Debt interfere with Imposter President's Birthday Party and re-election fundraiser now would we?


CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Documents confirm Obama administration’s ‘catch and release’ immigration policy

Well, what do you know. Obama administration officials at the Department of Homeland Security deliberately misled Congress when they denied using “selective enforcement” to deport convicted criminals in the U.S. illegally. Their much-criticized “catch and release” policy was confirmed by documents obtained by Judicial Watch under the Freedom of Information Act.



http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/07/documents-confirm-obama-administration-s-catch-and-release-immigr

The documents “show that the Obama administration is implementing ‘stealth amnesty’ which is an end-run around the rule of law and Congress,” said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton.

Contrary to administration claims that convicted criminals were being deported just as fast as DHS got them, the released documents show that local immigration officials were in fact being given what Judicial Watch describes as “wide latitude” to dismiss federal immigration charges –even against criminals convicted of violent crimes such as sexual assault, solicitation of murder, kidnapping, aggravated assault, drug possession and assaulting a police officer.

They were then released back into the same American communities they violated, where they were free to prey on new victims.

One example: A June 30, 2010 memo from John Morton, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Enforcement, instructs all ICE employees to use discretion in “prioritizing” deportation cases. As a result, Houston ICE increased its dismissals of deportation cases by 40 percent, earning praise from ICE headquarters.

“If the crime is remote in time and the alien has a substantial number of equities, all factors will be weighed to determine if an exercise of PD [prosecutorial discretion] is appropriate,” wrote Gary Goldman, chief counsel for Houston ICE, in a Aug. 12, 2010 memo. “ICE Senior Leadership does not want their attorneys to merely fill a seat in immigration court and blindly prosecute every case handed to them. The current administration wants attorneys of greater sophistication, independence and complexity in decision making…”

The current administration may want “sophistication”, but the American people want convicted foreign criminals kicked out of the U.S.A.

Another example: ICE officials in Pennsylvania advised police to release three illegal immigrants charged with speeding, driving without a license, insurance or registration under false identification.

This is strikingly similar to ICE’s refusal to deport Carlos Martinelly-Montano, who was subsequently charged with killing one nun and critically injuring two others last August in Prince William County in a drunk driving accident. Martinelly-Montano was allowed to remain in the U.S. despite two previous DUI convictions.

After critics in the media, including The Examiner, criticized ICE’s “catch and release” policy, Morton sent out another memo dated June 17, 2011 further defining the term “prosecutorial discretion.”

“In basic terms, prosecutorial discretion is the authority of an agency charged with enforcing a law to decide to what degree to enforce the law against a particular individual,” Morton writes. In other words, the identity of the foreign offender – not the crime itself – determines whether or not the criminal is deported.

As Fitton points out, this is exactly the selective enforcement that the Obama administration claimed it was not doing.

ATC SAYS - And all this to what? You better bet the answer is to appease the Mexican Government and garnish latino voters to the Democrat Voter Base...Happy with democrats who are willing to do anything to curry their favor...even violate the law and mislead the sheepish public with their lies to the contrary all the while they move behind our very backs to solidify their votes for the 2012 election. One only merely need look at Obongo's declining poll ratings to understand why he is trying to pander to the leaders of the Mexican amnesty groups. One case in point, in 2008, Obama gave Cecilia Munoz, La Raza’s former senior vice president, a cushy hack job as director of “International Affairs.” Obama understands that Latino voters are very personally engaged and watching carefully what is happening with the immigration policies because they know people who will be impacted by said policies!

CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Obama tries to stop execution in Texas of Mexican killer

US president warns Texan authorities that execution would put America in breach of international legal obligations (ATC Says - the Fuck you say! Mexico isn't worried about its international obligations concerning the flood of Illegal Immigrants into America...so why should we care what the hell they think about dealing with a deviant criminal on our soil that rapes and kills Americans ......much less what this ZOG tool in a suit with his teleprompter thinks!)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/05/obama-stop-texas-mexican-execution



President Barack Obama is attempting to block the execution in Texas on Thursday of a Mexican man because it would breach an international convention and do "irreparable harm" to US interests.

The White House has asked the US supreme court to put the execution of Humberto Leal Garcia on hold while Congress passes a law that would prevent the convicted rapist and murderer from being put to death along with dozens of other foreign nationals who were denied proper access to diplomatic representation before trials for capital crimes.

The administration moved after the governor of Texas, Rick Perry, brushed aside appeals from diplomats, top judges, senior military officers, the United Nations and former president George W Bush to stay Leal's execution because it could jeopardise American citizens arrested abroad as well as US diplomatic interests.

Leal, 38, was convicted in 1994 of the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl in San Antonio. Few question that he was responsible for the killing but the Texas authorities failed to tell Leal, who was born in Mexico and has lived in the US since the age of two, that under the Vienna convention he was entitled to contact the Mexican consulate when he was arrested.

Leal's lawyers argue that the lack of consular access played a role in the death penalty being applied because the Mexican national incriminated himself in statements made during "non-custodial interviews" with the police on the day of the murder. Had Leal had access to the Mexican consulate it would have been likely to have arranged a lawyer who would have advised the accused man to limit his statements to the police. As it was, the Mexican authorities were never informed of his arrest.

In a 30-page brief to the supreme court, the administration said that the carrying out of the execution "would place the United States in irreparable breach of its international law obligation" under the convention.

The White House said it was in the US's interests to meet its treaty obligations.

"These interests include protecting Americans abroad, fostering co-operation with foreign nations, and demonstrating respect for the international rule of law," it said.

Carrying out Leal's execution would cause "irreparable harm" to US interests abroad, the administration added.

"That breach would have serious repercussions for United States foreign relations, law-enforcement and other co-operation with Mexico, and the ability of American citizens travelling abroad to have the benefits of consular assistance in the event of detention," it said.

The legal situation has been complicated by earlier court rulings.

In 2004, the international court of justice (ICJ) ruled that the US authorities had failed to meet its legal obligations to 51 Mexicans awaiting execution in American prisons when they were not informed of their right to contact their consulates.

The then president, George W Bush, a former Texas governor who backs the death penalty, said the US would adhere to the ICJ ruling which, in effect, meant the death sentences would be reviewed or commuted. But in 2008 the supreme court ruled that while the US government was obliged to comply with the ICJ ruling it did not have the power to force individual American states to do so. Only Congress could require adherence by passing a law.

The Obama administration has told the supreme court that a bill has recently been introduced in to the Senate to do just that but it is unlikely to win the approval of both houses of Congress before next year. The White House wants Leal's execution put on hold until the law is passed but two courts have already ruled that pending legislation has no effect on the legal process.

The UN high commissioner for human rights, Navi Pillay, has appealed to Perry to commute Leal's sentence to life imprisonment.

Christof Heyns, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions said that if Leal was put to death it would be "tantamount to an arbitrary deprivation of life".

Perry's office has said Texas laws had been abided by and that Leal would be executed for "the most heinous of crimes".




ATC Says - OK lets suppose that this was some white guy from Colorado who snuck into mexico illegally (I know hard to believe...like why the hell would anybody want to illegally sneak into that shithole to begin with right) , lived there for some time, got a job layed low off the grid then suddenly got into trouble with the mexican authorities for the same crime........Do you seriously think that the Mexican Government is going to be concerned about their international legal obligations concerning the execution an American! HELL NO! That fucker is dead and deservedly so!

God I love Texas, probably one of the last bastions of racial sanity left that has a leader with balls big enough to stand up against the liberal agenda and evil machinations of the Obama-nation Obomination!

CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME