Sunday, October 25, 2009

List Of Obama's Czars



OBAMA’S CZARS
CZAR Czar Position Summary
Richard Holbrooke Afghanistan Czar Ultra liberal anti gun former Gov. of New Mexico. Pro Abortion and legal drug use.
Ed Montgomery

Auto recovery Czar Black radical anti business activist.Affirmative Action and Job Preference for blacks.Univ of Maryland Business School Dean teaches US business has caused world poverty.ACORN board member.Communist DuBois Club member.
Jeffrey Crowley

AIDS Czar Homosexual. A Gay Rights activist. Believes in Gay Marriage and Special Status, including free health care for gays.
Alan Bersin

Border Czar former failed superintendent of San Diego .Ultra Liberal friend of Hilary Clinton.Served as Border Czar under Janet Reno "" to keep borders open to illegals
David J. Hayes California Water Czar Sr. Fellow of radical environmentalist group, "Progress Policy"?.No training or experience in water management.
Ron Bloom Car Czar Auto Union worker. Anti business & anti nuclear.Has worked hard to force US auto makers out of business.Sits on the Board of Chrysler which is now Auto Union owned.How did this happen?
Dennis Ross Central Region Czar Believes US policy has caused Mid East wars.Obama apologist to the world.Anti gun and pro abortion.
Lynn Rosenthal Domestic Violence Czar Director of the National Network to End Domestic Violence.Vicious anti male feminist. Supported male castration.
Gil Kerlikowske Drug Czar devoted lobbyist for every restrictive gun law proposal,Former Chief of Police in Liberal Seattle.Believes no American should own a firearm.Supports legalization of drugs



Carol Brower Energy and Environment Czar Political Radical Former head of EPA – known for anti-business activism.Strong anti-gun ownership. SOCIALIST on Commission for a Sustainable World Society, which calls for “global governance” and says rich countries must shrink their economies to address climate change.
Joshua DuBois Faith Based Czar Political Black activist-Degree in Black Nationalism""seek a separate black nation..Anti gun ownership lobbyist.
Cameron Davis Great Lakes Czar Chicago radical anti business environmentalist.Blames GeorgeBush for "Poisoning the water that minorities have to drink."?No experience or training in w ater management.Former ACORN Board member
Van Jones Green Jobs Czar (since resigned).Black activist Member of American communist Party and San Francisco Communist Partywho said Geo Bush caused the 911 attack and wanted Bush investigated by the World Court for war crimes.MARXIST, said whites are poisoning blacks, said transformation from "suicidal gray capitalism to econ-capitalism to the complete redistribution of wealth."?Black activist with strong anti-white views.
Daniel Fried Guantanamo Closure Czar Rights activist for Foreign Terrorists.Believes America has caused the war on terrorism.
Nancy-Ann DeParle. Health Czar Former head of Medicare / Medicaid.Strong Health Care Rationing proponent.She is married to a reporter for The New York Times.
Vivek Kundra Information Czar born in New Delhi, India.Controls all public information, including labels and news releases.Monitors all private Internet emails.
Todd Stern International Climate Czar Anti business former White House chief of Staff- Strong supportrer of the Kyoto Accord.Pushing hard for Cap and Trade.Blames US business for Global warming.
Dennis Blair Intelligence Czar Ret Navy. Stopped US guided missile program as "provocative"?.Chair of ultra liberal "Council on Foreign Relations"? which blames American organizations for regional wars.
George Mitchell Mideast Peace Czar Fmr. Sen from Maine Left wing radical.Has said Israel should be split up into "2 or 3 " mediumer more manageable plots"?.Anti-nuclear anti-gun & pro homosexual
Kenneth Feinberg Pay Czar Chief of Staff to TED KENNEDY.Lawyer who got rich off the 911 victims payoffs.
Cass Sunstein Regulatory Czar Liberal activist judge believes free speech needs to be limited for the "common good"?.Rules against personal freedoms many times ""like private gun ownership. Says animals should be able to sue people. Anti-hunting..
John Holdren Science Czar Fierce ideological environmentalist, Sierra Club, Anti business activist.Claims US business has caused world poverty.No Science training.OK to abort a child until the age of two.Thinks TREES should be able to sue humans.
Earl Devaney Stimulus Accountability Czar spent career trying to take guns away from American citizens.Believes in Open Borders to Mexico .Author ofstatement blaming US gun stores for drug war in Mexico .
J. Scott Gration Sudan Czar Native of Democratic Republic of Congo.Believes US does little to help Third World countries.Council of foreign relations, asking for higher US taxes to support United Nations
Herb Allison TARP Czar Fannie May CEO responsible for the US recession by using real estate mortgages to back up the US stock market. Caused millions ofpeople to lose their life savings.
John Brennan Terrorism Czar Anti CIA activist.No training in diplomatic or gov. affairs.Believes Open Borders to Mexico and a dialog with terrorists and has suggested Obama disband US military
Aneesh Chopra Technology Czar No Technology training.Worked for the Advisory Board Company, a health care think tank for hospitals. Anti doctor activist.Supports Obama Health care Rationing and salaried doctors working exclusively for the Gov. health care plan
Adolfo Carrion Jr. Urban Affairs Czar Puerto Rican.Anti American activist and leftist group member in Latin America .Millionaire "slum lord"? of the Bronx , NY.Owns many lavish homes and condos which he got from "sweetheart"? deals with labor unions.Wants higher taxes to pay for minority housing and health care
Ashton Carter Weapons Czar Leftist.Wants all private weapons in US destroyed.Supports UN ban on firearms ownership in America .No Other "policy"?
Gary Samore WMD Policy Czar Former US Communist.Wants US to destroy all WMD unilaterally as a show of good faith.Has no other "policy"?.

Kevin Jennings SAFE SCHOOL CZARS As a teacher when a 15 year year said he was having sex with an older man, instead of turning in the man "the law for a teacher, he asked how it was going and suggested they use condoms.Held a conference with the MAXIMUM age of 18 to teach homosexual issues like fisting.?Wrote the intro to the book, "Queering Elementary Education."? Has repeatedly praised and claims to be inspired by Harry Hay, early supporter of NAMBLA, (Noth American Man Boy Love Association).



Callin' all Czars...!

This video is about our Premier Obama and his gestapo he is trying to put over us with no way to regulate them.


GLEN BECK 09-05-2009 - The funniest home videos are here

Don't you see what Obama is doing folks. It's like there is an exoskeleton being constructed around our existing government structure. Obama is appointing extreme radicals to high posts in his administration that are loyal to him. These Czars answer only to the president and not the Senate or the Congress and function without oversight. These people are in place, I believe, so that when the time is right and the change over to Obomunism is ready, the old structure can be torn down and and a new one will be ready to replace it and no longer be the shadow government it has been.

That he is surrounding himself with enough people who will remain loyal to him under any circumstance? Again I have to ask,Does it seem like to any of you that he is creating a shadow government within the construct of our existing one. By putting people he can trust who are loyal to him in key positions of power so that when the changeover to socialism is rolled out he will have little to no political opposition! More and more it sure is seeming so to me



Barack Hussein Obama, cold, steely, sees himself as our ruler. His plan? Tear down our U.S. Constitution ... and he is doing it with the help of the Congressional-majority Democrats and the corrupt, appointed Liberal judges


CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Obama’s America is awash in brutal black on white crime!

Not like we're going to hear this from the mainstream news propaganda machine........

The night of the brutal attack on a white family in Akron, there were ten other white victims treated for attacks. This news has been completely censored by the media and the cowardly Akron police department.

http://cofcc.org/?p=5854

Since the election of Obama in November, crime has been on the rise. The most censored and covered up aspect of our current crime wave is rampant and brutal attacks on white people by blacks.

We have been following the savage mob attack on a white family in Akron. Finally, weeks after the attack, we are just now learning that more white people were savagely attacked by blacks on the same night.

A wolf pack of dozens of blacks ran through the city attacking any white person, man, woman, or child, they could find. All while shouting black power slogans. The cowardly Akron police department lied about the details of the attack on the family and said it was not race related. The Akron Chief of Police was then humiliated when the Mayor went over his head and called the FBI for help.

From Akron Beacon Journal…

Community leaders are now voicing disgust over the attack, which is an example of the city’s ballooning assault rate.

In police District 6, which includes Firestone Park, reports show that aggravated assaults have more than doubled this year compared with 2008.

The increase in aggravated assaults is even more dramatic in other areas of the city.

What happened on Girard Street is also a symbol of Akron’s hushed racial tension. The victims are white; their attackers are black.

The attack has ignited scores of reaction, including a call for justice for the victims by the Rev. Al Sharpton. [Look at this fictional statement that the Beacon Journal threw in. It is completely false. Al Sharpton did not call for justice for the victims. A reporter called the office of Al Sharpton and a spokesman for his group half-heartedly said the perpetrators should be prosecuted. He then added qualifiers, saying that fictional white attackers should also be prosecuted. However he didn't actually point out who these imaginary white attackers of black people are. Al Sharpton has never commented on the events.]

From his view, Alchier said there’s more to the story than has been told.

”The newspapers and the news is not telling the entire story. No one is,” Alchier said from his home in Akron.

Those who witnessed the assault or survived it say this was no isolated incident, and the beatings to Greg Alchier and his friend, Marty Marshall, extended farther than Girard Street that night. A third victim is identified in a police report. More are believed to have been treated for injuries.

Case in point, he said: Emergency room personnel at Akron General Medical Center told him that as many as 10 other people were treated for injuries that night after being attacked by a group of teens.

The Alchier family, who have lived in the Firestone Park neighborhood for about four decades, also expressed frustration over the city’s reaction.

During the assault, John Alchier said, he was placed on hold when he called 911 for police. He has filed a complaint about the call with the department, which said it was investigating.

Although police say they are investigating the attack, Alchier said last week that no detective has sought his interview.

”I think it’s completely appalling,” he said.
________________________________________________

So Do I!

I too am hearing about this shit here in my neck of the woods and the media covers it up they have no problem identifying the attacker and calling it a hate crime when the suspects are white, but when the attackers are non-white they always say this "it's a mystery, we have no idea what provoked this random attack must be gang related" - OMFG such bullshit It's racially modivated! and the victims are always white that makes it a hate crime, gee pretty obvious to me!



CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Obama Bombshell Audio Uncovered. He wants to Radically Reinterpret the Constitution to Redistribute Wealth!! Interview from 2001!

Here's some audio from a radio interview in 2001.



Obama Bombshell Audio Uncovered. He wants to Radically Reinterpret the Constitution to Redistribute Wealth!!

In a 2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview
Obama is discussing the best way to bring about a Redistribution of Wealth!!!
This Video Exposes the radical underneath the rhetoric!!!

The warning signs were there people yet you stupid sheep failed to see the obvious and voted for him anyways. When you're finished enjoying the change you voted for and are ready to get off your asses lets correct this mistake and take our country back!

CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Glenn Beck on Obama's Private Army

PART 1:



PART 2:




Glenn Beck on Thursday, August 27, 2009..A Must See. Glenn exposes Obama's New Civilian National Security Force. Gestapo Much?? The Beginning of The Brown Shirts?? Is THIS STILL AMERICA??? Someone wake me up. I'm only dreaming. RIGHT??

Hitler had such a national security force ------ they were called the SS. Historical parralles can sure be a bitch! Thank's For Watching - Now go Wake Up The Sheeple.

CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Obama's approval in a freefall

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 27% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -13.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history



Simply translated as of this post his approval rating is 47% (that's the lowest it's gone) with 53% total dissaproving of his performance to date. Do not be fooled by the Obama Propaganda Media Machine folks, despite what the alphabet channels on MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC or CNN tell you, only 27% of America actually approve of what this naked Marxist is doing to our country - that's 1 in 4 who are still deluded or too ignorant to accept the facts. Liberals don't have time for facts anyways - they're still drinking the kool-aid!



CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Baucus Senate Health Care Bill Finally Unveiled! (PDF of Bill Included!)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/16/health-care-bill-baucus-s_n_288218.html

WASHINGTON — His calls for compromise rebuffed by Republicans, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Finance Committee unveiled sweeping legislation Wednesday to remake the nation's costly health care system largely along the lines outlined by President Barack Obama.

Sen. Max Baucus' proposal, months in the making, drew quick criticism from liberals who said his vision was too cramped and from Republicans who deemed it overly expansive. Yet whatever its fate, its mere release marked a critical turning point in Congress' long and tumultuous debate over Obama's top domestic priority.

The Finance Committee is to meet next week to vote on the plan, and after combining it with another panel's bill, Majority Leader Harry Reid intends to begin debate on the Senate floor late this month or early October. Across the Capitol, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been waiting to see Baucus' health care prescription before advancing companion legislation toward a vote by the House.

"We cannot let this opportunity pass," Baucus, D-Mont., said as he outlined a $856 billion plan designed to protect millions who have unreliable insurance or no coverage at all, at the same time restraining the explosive growth of medical costs.

Congressional budget experts estimated the proposal would reduce the ranks of the uninsured by 29 million over a decade. They also predicted the plan would trim federal deficits by $49 billion over the same period and suggested savings in the range of hundreds of billions of dollars might result for the decade that follows.

Many of the bill's major provisions would be delayed until 2013, after the next presidential election.

But the impact of one of the key concessions Baucus made in a so-far-unsuccessful search for Republican support – allowing cooperatives, rather than the federal government, to sell insurance in competition with private industry – was judged harshly.

"They seem unlikely to establish a significant market presence in many areas of the country," wrote Douglas W. Elmendorf, head of the Congressional Budget Office.

Supporters claim the co-ops would compete effectively with private companies and help hold down the cost of insurance, but CBO's assessment is likely to re-energize advocates of direct government competition.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs called the overall legislation an "important building block" that "gets us closer to comprehensive health care reform."

Reid, too, described it as "another important piece to the puzzle" on the road to health care legislation.

Pelosi said that while the bill would do less than House legislation to make coverage more affordable, its emergence "will move this historic debate forward."

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who has labored to keep his rank and file united in opposition, called it a partisan proposal that "cuts Medicare by nearly a half-trillion dollars and puts massive new tax burdens on families and small businesses, to create yet another thousand-page, trillion-dollar government program. Only in Washington would anyone think that makes sense, especially in this economy."

Baucus' legislation reflected nearly a year of preparation by the 67-year-old Montanan, a partially successful attempt to gain support from outside interest groups, and months of painstaking private negotiations with two other Democrats and three Republicans on the Finance Committee.

With White House backing, the nation's drug makers and hospitals have agreed to defray part of the expense of the eventual bill, and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America is underwriting a television advertising campaign at a cost of tens of millions in favor of health care legislation. The AARP generally supports the effort as well, despite the cuts in planned Medicare spending, and even opposition from the insurance industry has been somewhat muted.

Even so, the private negotiations involving Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Mike Enzi of Wyoming and Olympia Snowe of Maine came up short, at least for the time being.

Baucus told reporters he expected he would gain bipartisan backing before the bill emerges from committee, probably next week, an evident reference to Snowe. "This is a first step in the process," Snowe said in a written statement, and she promised to continue to work with Baucus and Democrats on drafting a bipartisan bill.

The other Democrats in the talks were Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico.

Like other proposals in circulation, Baucus' plan would require insurance companies to sell coverage to all seeking it, without exclusions for pre-existing medical conditions or prohibitively expensive premiums.

The legislation would create so-called insurance exchanges in the states where companies could sell policies that meet criteria set by the government, with federal subsidies available for lower-income individuals and families who would otherwise be unable to afford coverage. Any policy offered for sale in the exchanges would have to cover preventive and primary care as well as dental, prescription drug, mental health and vision services. In general, consumer copays on preventive coverage would be banned.

Additionally the plan envisions cutting a coverage gap in Medicare prescription drug program in half over a decade, although not as deeply as Obama called for in last week's prime-time speech.

To hold down costs, Baucus included only one year of a 10-year, $230 billion increase in doctor fees under Medicare.

The legislation calls for a new tax on high-cost insurance plans, a series of fees and taxes on insurance companies, the pharmaceutical industry and other health care providers, and penalties assessed on people who refuse to purchase coverage or large companies that refuse to offer it to their employees.

Planned Medicare spending would be cut by roughly $500 billion over a decade, with about one-quarter of that money coming from private plans sold as an alternative to traditional government coverage. The House bill calls for far deeper cuts in the alternative program, to the point that industry officials say it could disappear.

Among Baucus' critics were liberals in the House and labor leaders who have been among Obama's strongest supporters.

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who has long been involved in health care issues, said the proposal doesn't go far enough to control costs or guarantee a greater choice among health plans for consumers.

Chuck Loveless, the director of legislation at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, said, "Chairman Baucus has made what I would characterize as a herculean effort to produce this, but we think that the cost has been too high, and we want to see major changes."

In the House, Rep. Anthony Weiner of New York, who favors a government-run program, said, "I think I speak for many members of Congress in saying that the Senate proposal simply will not pass muster in the House of Representatives and fails on very basic levels to satisfy the objectives of the president and the citizens of the United States of America."

Like authors of competing bills in the House and in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Baucus worked his way through numerous controversial issues. Unlike them, though, his reflected a desire to seek bipartisanship.

Thus, the bill includes provisions to keep illegal immigrants from obtaining health coverage through the new insurance exchanges.

The bill also would prevent federal funds from being used to pay for abortions except in cases of rape, incest or if the life of the mother would be endangered. It would leave in place state laws that protect health care workers who refuse to participate in abortion coverage.
__________________________________________________________

HERE IS THE PDF OF THE PROPOSED BILL BEING VOTED ON IN THE SENATE THEY ARE GOING TO FORCE DOWN OUR THROATS:

http://BGunn88.fileave.com/091609%20Americas_Healthy_Future_Act.pdf

This is going to be voted on on the 27th! This is their trojan horse. They could not push the government option through in it's original draft which as you may recall caused alot of uproar in the town hall meetings through the course of August - so now they will bypass the people and surreptitiously implement it in the Baucus bill which is only in it's draft stages! The wording of this bill will change and evolve after it is passed and will not even resemble this bill but will be more like it's predecessor with legislation inserted later. This is how the gangsters operate, and this is why they must be taken down.



PHOTO CAPTION: Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. gestures during his news conference on health care legislation, Wednesday, Sept. 16, 2009, Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)





CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Obama Preparing to Sell Out America's Sovereignty!

http://www.rightsidenews.com/200910176886/border-and-sovereignty/obama-preparing-to-sell-out-americas-sovereignty.html

Written by Atlas Shrugs
Saturday, 17 October 2009 06:51


On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton, a noted climate change skeptic, gave a presentation at Bethel University in St. Paul, MN. In this 4 minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty, scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009.

Lord Monckton served as a policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher. He has repeatedly challenged Al Gore to a debate, which Gore has refused. Monckton sued to stop Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" from being shown in British schools due to its inaccuracies. The judge found in favor of Monckton, ordering 9 serious errors in the film to be corrected. Lord Monckton travels internationally in an attempt to educate the public about the myth of global warming.

Eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second - OBAMA POISED TO CEDE US SOVEREIGNTY, CLAIMS BRITISH LORD






The Minnesota Free Market Institute hosted an event at Bethel University in St. Paul on Wednesday evening. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.

A detailed summary of Monckton's presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizen's focused attention.

Here were Monckton's closing remarks, as dictated from my audio recording:

At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they're going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won't sign it.

I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word "government" actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, "climate debt" - because we've been burning CO2 and they haven't. We've been screwing up the climate and they haven't. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.

How many of you think that the word "election" or "democracy" or "vote" or "ballot" occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn't appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it - Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He's going to sign it. He'll sign anything. He's a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he'll sign it.

[laughter]

And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution, and you can't resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties - And because you'll be the biggest paying country, they're not going to let you out of it.

So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I've read the treaty. I've seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.

But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire - it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it.

So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:

Sail on, O Ship of State!
Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,
With all the hopes of future years,
Is hanging breathless on thy fate!

---- End of Speech -----------Some questions for Lord Monckton-----

Lord Monckton received a standing ovation and took a series of questions from members of the audience. Among those questions were these relevent to the forthcoming Copenhagen treaty:

Question: The current administration and the Democratic majority in Congress has shown little regard for the will of the people. They're trying to pass a serious government agenda, and serious taxation and burdens on future generations. And there seems to be little to stop them. How do you propose we stop Obama from doing this, because I see no way to stop him from signing anything in Copenhagen. I believe that's his agenda and he'll do it.

Response: I don't minimize the difficulty. But on this subject - I don't really do politics, because it's not right. In the end, your politics is for you. The correct procedure is for you to get onto your representatives, both in the US Senate where the bill has yet to go through (you can try and stop that) and in [the House], and get them to demand their right of audience (which they all have) with the president and tell him about this treaty. There are many very powerful people in this room, wealthy people, influential people.

Get onto the media, tell them about this treaty. If they go to www.wattsupwiththat.com, they will find (if they look carefully enough) a copy of that treaty, because I arranged for it to be posted there not so long ago. Let them read it, and let the press tell the people that their democracy is about to be taken away for no good purpose, at least [with] no scientific basis [in reference to climate change]. Tell the press to say this. Tell the press to say that, even if there is a problem [with climate change], you don't want your democracy taken away. It really is as simple as that.

Question: Is it really irrevocable if that treaty is signed? Suppose it's signed by someone who does not have the authority, as I - I have some, a high degree of skepticism that we do have a valid president there because I know at least one judge who shares your opinion, sir, yes.

I don't believe it until I see it. ... Would [Obama's potential illegitimacy as president] give us a reasonable cause to nullify whatever treaty that he does sign as president?

Response: I would be very careful not to rely on things like that. Although there is a certain amount of doubt whether or not he was born in Hawaii, my fear is it would be very difficult to prove he wasn't born in Hawaii and therefore we might not be able to get anywhere with that. Besides, once he's signed that treaty, whether or not he signed it validly, once he's signed it and ratified it - your Senate ratifies it - you're bound by it. But I will say one thing; they know, in the White House, that they won't be able to get the 67 votes in the Senate, the two-thirds majority that your Constitution has stipulated must be achieved in order to ratify a treaty of this kind. However, what they've worked out is this - and they actually let it slip during the election campaign, which is how I know about it.

They plan to enact that Copenhagen treaty into legislation by a simple majority of both houses. That they can do. But the virtue of that - and here you have a point - is that is, thank God, reversible. So I want you to pray tonight, and pray hard for your Senate that they utterly refuse to ratify the [new] Treaty of Copenhagen, because if they refuse to ratify it and [Obama] has to push it through as domestic legislation, you can repeal it.

Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution. If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.

Verifying the treaty clauses Mockton made reference to:

Skimming through the treaty, I came across verification of Monckton's assessment of the new entity's purpose:

38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:

World Government (heading added)
(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.

To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)
b) The Convention's financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components, © a Technology window; (d) a Mitigation window; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.

With Enforcement Authority (heading added)
The Convention's facilitative mechanism will include:

(a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation;

(b) a long-term REDD process;

(c) a short-term technology action plan;

(d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and

(e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries.

The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre for information exchange [read; enforcement].

I urge all Atlas readers immediately to contact your congressman NOW AND DEMAND that they do the job they were elected to do, keep America safe and protect her from her enemies, even if that enemy is in the White House.
________________________________________________

So there you have it . That is the master plan of the Obama Administration. And I thought his plans for redistribution of wealth was limited here to the United (Soon to be divided) States. Nope seems he intends to redistribute our wealth all across the third word to make us into another tird-world toilet. Once he signs this treaty in December.....
Bdee, bdee, bdeeThat's all folks! That's it...... our soverignty is gone! We can debate and deliberate in town halls with our congressmen all we want but face it, what is left when the system fails us and our words like dollars carry little value.........need I go there? I think not those of us familiar enough with history know what I am talking about!



CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Obama Kenyan Birth Reference from 2004 Article

Sunday, June 27, 2004
Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate

http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.

Ryan’s campaign began to crumble on Monday following the release of embarrassing records from his divorce. In the records, his ex-wife, Boston Public actress Jeri Ryan, said her former husband took her to kinky sex clubs in Paris, New York and New Orleans.

"It’s clear to me that a vigorous debate on the issues most likely could not take place if I remain in the race," Ryan, 44, said in a statement. "What would take place, rather, is a brutal, scorched-earth campaign – the kind of campaign that has turned off so many voters, the kind of politics I refuse to play."

Although Ryan disputed the allegations, saying he and his wife went to one ‘avant-garde’ club in Paris and left because they felt uncomfortable, lashed out at the media and said it was "truly outrageous" that the Chicago Tribune got a judge to unseal the records.

The Republican choice will become an instant underdog in the campaign for the seat of retiring Republican Senator Peter Fitzgerald, since Obama held a wide lead even before the scandal broke.

"I feel for him actually," Obama told a Chicago TV station. "What he’s gone through over the last three days I think is something you wouldn’t wish on anybody."

The Republican state committee must now choose a replacement for Ryan, who had won in the primaries against seven contenders. Its task is complicated by the fact that Obama holds a comfortable lead in the polls and is widely regarded as a rising Democratic star.

The chairwoman of the Illinois Republican Party, Judy Topinka, said at a news conference, after Ryan withdrew, that Republicans would probably take several weeks to settle on a new candidate.

"Obviously, this is a bad week for our party and our state," she said.

As recently as Thursday, spokesmen for the Ryan campaign still insisted that Ryan would remain in the race. Ryan had defended himself saying, "There’s no breaking of any laws. There’s no breaking of any marriage laws. There’s no breaking of the Ten Commandments anywhere."

—AP





_______________________________________________________

Save this article to your hardrive friends. I suspect this will "disappear" shortly.

Here's another link from a different source from the 2004 article.

Obama Born In Kenya According To 2004 News Article | CMR


I wonder how much more evidence the media propaganda machine can cover up in this latest turn of events. No doubt they will laugh it off as a conspiracy perpetrated by the right wing extremists and "Birthers" to undermine Obama's presidency. Sadly though it seems that ir-regardless of the available evidence not one single court case regarding the eligibility of Obama to be President based on the fact that he is not a citizen of the United States, and their certainly is alot to support the case for the fact that he is not a citizen, all these cases have been thrown out by ultra liberal judges sympathetic to the socialist agenda of the Obama Administration.

I fear that this information just like everything else regarding this whole issue will be swept under the rug for that is as it seems in this day and age - "The Truth No Longer Matters and is certainly no defense. Well at least until we the people change that!"





CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Obama Cult Recruits School Children

http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=2770#more-2770

by James Buchanan




[Obama cultists]

One of the creepiest manifestations of the Obama cult is the transformation of “urban youth” (read blacks and Hispanics) into Obama cult votaries. They sing songs in praise of The One, writing group letters to The One, and generally comporting themselves in the manner of Red pioneer youth in the old Soviet Union. One especially creepy song session can be found in the video below.





An NBC news article reports http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local-beat/Mr-Obama-Can-We-Come-and-Visit-You---64185587.html “Mia Henry wants to teach Barack Obama how to use iPhoto. She wants to show the president how to take pictures and create podcasts, just like she does as a member of the Barack Obama Digital Media Team, a group of students from Crenshaw High School who are determined to get invited to the White House. ‘I’d also tell him of my dreams to go to college, so I can work with autistic children as a child psychologist,’ Henry said.”

Whatever happened to normal White American children who want to become firemen and astronauts? What kind of strange socialist child wants to grow up to work with autistic children?

The NBC article notes “Using Barack Obama as inspiration, teacher Daphne Bradford has created projects Crenshaw and Dorsey high schools — schools in poverty-ridden sections of Los Angeles — to engage students to learn technological and cooking skills… At Crenshaw High, students on the Barack Obama Digital Media Team use technology to create digital art inspired by the president. They call it their Journey to the White House campaign… Students recorded video letters to the President aboard the John Lennon Educational Tour Bus…”

Excuse me, but I just had to throw up. Isn’t the use of public schools to recruit political cannon fodder in a partisan election campaign illegal? Silly me. I forgot these are blacks. The law doesn’t apply to them. What will happen a few years from now when the regime needs thugs and shock troops, and they start passing out rifles to these young political militants who are now being taught to worship The One as a god?
___________________________________________________________

Does this video remind anybody of anything, speaking from a historic perspective that is, or is it just me? Hitler, Stalin, Kim Jon Il, etc. etc (Insert Dictator's Name Here).

Speaking of recent history without getting into the Hitler Youth and all, this reminds me of North Korea and their praise/worship songs for Kim Jong Il......disturbing!! do a little googling and youtube-ing. I think you will see what I mean how childern...and all adults for that matter sing and praise Kim Jong Il like a like a hero/god. Because they essentially have no communication with the outside world, all that they get to hear is what their savior Kim Jong Il wants them to hear......making himself look like a hero to them obviously....and how could they believe otherwise?!? this whole situation in America and Obama, in my opinion, parallels North Korea to a frightening extent. People are almost too brainwahsed, by the crooked news media, to notice what's going on in this country. They are too enamoured with how great of a leader/hero that Obama is that they they fail to see the bigger picture and the lame truth in what they call their American hero Obama. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!

Shades of Hitler Youth or communist indoctrination....Seems pretty obvious to me!



CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Monday, October 12, 2009

Obama adviser says Sharia Law is misunderstood

Isn't it no suprise how the Appeasist Obama and his so-called Advisors take up anti-american and apologist positions when dealing with foreign powers and traveling around other countries. When are the sheeple going to understand that these idiots do not have the best interests of the American people at heart, but only the furtherance of their elitest agenda as they are abroad supposedly representing you and me? We no longer have a government of representation for and by the people, those days are dead what we have now is something far worse...........

President Barack Obama's adviser on Muslim affairs, Dalia Mogahed, has provoked controversy by appearing on a British television show hosted by a member of an extremist group to talk about Sharia Law

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6274387/Obama-adviser-says-Sharia-Law-is-misunderstood.html

By Andrew Gilligan and Alex Spillius in Washington
Published: 8:00PM BST 08 Oct 2009

Miss Mogahed, appointed to the President's Council on Faith-Based and Neighbourhood Partnerships, said the Western view of Sharia was "oversimplified" and the majority of women around the world associate it with "gender justice".

The White House adviser made the remarks on a London-based TV discussion programme hosted by Ibtihal Bsis, a member of the extremist Hizb ut Tahrir party.

The group believes in the non-violent destruction of Western democracy and the creation of an Islamic state under Sharia Law across the world.

Miss Mogahed appeared alongside Hizb ut Tahrir's national women's officer, Nazreen Nawaz.

During the 45-minute discussion, on the Islam Channel programme Muslimah Dilemma earlier this week, the two members of the group made repeated attacks on secular "man-made law" and the West's "lethal cocktail of liberty and capitalism".

They called for Sharia Law to be "the source of legislation" and said that women should not be "permitted to hold a position of leadership in government".

Miss Mogahed made no challenge to these demands and said that "promiscuity" and the "breakdown of traditional values" were what Muslims admired least about the West.

She said: "I think the reason so many women support Sharia is because they have a very different understanding of sharia than the common perception in Western media.

"The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or justice for women, with sharia compliance.

"The portrayal of Sharia has been oversimplified in many cases."

Sharia in its broadest sense is a religious code for living, which decrees such matters as fasting and dressing modestly. However, it has also been interpreted as requiring the separation of men and women.

It also includes the controversial "Hadd offences", crimes with specific penalties set by the Koran and the sayings of the prophet Mohammed. These include death by stoning for adultery and homosexuality and the removal of a hand for theft.

Miss Mogahed admitted that even many Muslims associated Sharia with "maximum criminal punishments" and "laws that... to many people seem unequal to women," but added: "Part of the reason that there is this perception of Sharia is because Sharia is not well understood and Islam as a faith is not well understood."

The video of the broadcast has now been prominently posted on the front page of Hizb ut Tahrir's website.

Miss Mogahed, who was born in Egypt and moved to America at the age of five, is the first veiled Muslim woman to serve in the White House. Her appointment was seen as a sign of the Obama administration's determination to reach out to the Muslim world.

She is also the executive director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies, a project which aims to scientifically sample public opinion in the Muslim world.

During this week's broadcast, she described her White House role as "to convey... to the President and other public officials what it is Muslims want."

Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, said Miss Mogahed was “downplaying” Sharia Law.

“There is a reason sharia has got a bad name and it is how it has been exercised. Regrettably in the US there have been acts of injustice perpetrated against women that are driven by the Sharia-type mindset that women are objects not human beings,” she said.

She cited the example of Muzzammil Hassan, a Buffalo man who ran a cable channel aimed at countering Muslim stereotypes and was charged earlier this year with beheading his wife after she filed for divorce.

“Americans understand by example, it’s not as if we are an ignorant mass of people. Just as we don’t broad brush all Muslims, so should Dalia not downplay the serious nature of sharia law.”
__________________________________________________________________________

So there you have it friends. This is a naked admission by the enemy in their plans to take over western civilization peacfully (as they call it) and institute Islamic law. Looks like they plan to take through subversion that which they have never been able to take by force. Western civilzation has always defeated Islam in major past conflicts, so now they've put down their swords and are sneaking in through the back door and putting themselves in positions of power, just one problem though - the Jews run this country, have for many years, and of course they will never share power with their blood enemy.




CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Barack Obama Gets Nobel Prize for his First 9 Days

http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=2742#more-2742

Oh heck, let’s just give him every award then.

by James Buchanan

Even moderates and some liberals are shocked that Obama has been awarded a Nobel Peace Prize after accomplishing absolutely nothing and backpedaling on his promises to pull out of Iraq. The nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize must be submitted by February 1st of each year. Barack Obama was sworn in as president just past noon on January 20th. This means Obama had just nine and a half days to actually do something to earn that prize.

Did Obama declare an end to the Iraq war? Did he declare that the neocons committed crimes and lied us into that war? Did he admit that the war on Afghanistan was really a retaliation against the Taliban awarding a multi-billion dollar pipeline project to Bridas Oil of Argentina instead of giving it to Unocal? Did he expose all the secret information about the 911 incident and the extent of CIA and/or MOSSAD involvement? No.

The truth is there were several things he could have done to earn a Nobel Prize, but he did none of them. If Ron Paul had been elected president, he would have likely halted patrols in Iraq, declared the occupation ended and begun the withdrawal of US troops in his first few days. Ron Paul could have and would have earned a Nobel Prize based on his first nine days in office.

Barack Obama however chose to be an obedient puppet for the sinister forces that control the US government. Obama’s closest advisor, Israeli dual-citizen Rahm Emanual, no doubt told Obama to keep US troops in Iraq because that’s what the Israeli Lobby demands of him.

As long as the liberal world feels obliged to shower honors on Barack Obama, maybe they’ll also award him the Nobel Prize for literature for those two books that Bill Ayers wrote for him and an Oscar for pretending to be a natural born US citizen. Heck, let’s give him the title of Miss America too while we’re at it

Ok folks, The deadline for nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize was just 12 days after this joke was elected. What single thing has Obama done up until that time to promote peace? Nothing, That's what! Well aside from being a lawyer for Child Porn friendly ACORN and sitting in a racist church drinking Reverend Wright's kool-aide. What a sham, this only goes to prove what a meaningless award the Nobel Peace Prize is, to give it to someone who has accomplished nothing, well at least he's not alone just look at who else has received the award. The Fraud Al (Bore) Gore, And Socialist peanut farmer Jimmy Carter who still goes out of his way to hurt America.

By God it's a 12 day miracle, someboby pass me the Hope-ium!


CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Friday, October 9, 2009

Warmonger Wins Peace Prize

http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts10092009.html

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS


It took 25 years longer than George Orwell thought for the slogans of 1984 to become reality.

“War is Peace,” “Freedom is Slavery,” “Ignorance is Strength.”

I would add, “Lie is Truth.”

The Nobel Committee has awarded the 2009 Peace Prize to President Obama, the person who started a new war in Pakistan, upped the war in Afghanistan, and continues to threaten Iran with attack unless Iran does what the US government demands and relinquishes its rights as a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty.

The Nobel committee chairman, Thorbjoern Jagland said, “Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future.”

Obama, the committee gushed, has created “a new climate in international politics.”

Tell that to the 2 million displaced Pakistanis and the unknown numbers of dead ones that Obama has racked up in his few months in office. Tell that to the Afghans where civilian deaths continue to mount as Obama’s “war of necessity” drones on indeterminably.

No Bush policy has changed. Iraq is still occupied. The Guantanamo torture prison is still functioning. Rendition and assassinations are still occurring. Spying on Americans without warrants is still the order of the day. Civil liberties are continuing to be violated in the name of Oceania’s “war on terror.”

Apparently, the Nobel committee is suffering from the delusion that, being a minority, Obama is going to put a stop to Western hegemony over darker-skinned peoples.

The non-cynical can say that the Nobel committee is seizing on Obama’s rhetoric to lock him into the pursuit of peace instead of war. We can all hope that it works. But the more likely result is that the award has made “War is Peace” the reality.

Obama has done nothing to hold the criminal Bush regime to account, and the Obama administration has bribed and threatened the Palestinian Authority to go along with the US/Israeli plan to deep-six the UN’s Goldstone Report on Israeli war crimes committed during Israel’s inhuman military attack on the defenseless civilian population in the Gaza Ghetto.

The US Ministry of Truth is delivering the Obama administration’s propaganda that Iran only notified the IAEA of its “secret” new nuclear facility because Iran discovered that US intelligence had discovered the “secret” facility. This propaganda is designed to undercut the fact of Iran’s compliance with the Safeguards Agreement and to continue the momentum for a military attack on Iran.

The Nobel committee has placed all its hopes on a bit of skin color.

“War is Peace” is now the position of the formerly antiwar organization, Code Pink.
Code Pink has decided that women’s rights are worth a war in Afghanistan.

When justifications for war become almost endless--oil, hegemony, women’s rights, democracy, revenge for 9/11, denying bases to al Qaeda and protecting against terrorists--war becomes the path to peace.

The Nobel committee has bestowed the prestige of its Peace Prize on Newspeak and Doublethink.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.He can be reached at: PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com






What a farce! He has done nothing to promote peace, in fact he has done the exact opposite. Funny twist is that for him to have been nominated the nobel prize comitte selected him back in february just a few short days after his innaugural address. A FEW DAYS! He Deserves this???? The only positive side to this is this makes him look rediculous before the world And that is a good thing

CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Former White House Speechwriter Suggests Military Coup Could Oust Obama

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2009/09/full_text_of_newsmax_column_suggesting_military_co.php?ref=fpblg


By: John L. Perry

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America's military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the "Obama problem." Don't dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn't the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn't mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

# Officers swear to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to "obey the orders of the president of the United States."

# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.

# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.

# They can see that the economy -- ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation -- is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.

# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.

# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America's troop strength is allowed to sag.

# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.

# They can see the nation's safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.

So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan's arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran's nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, "I'm not interested in victory") that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America's military leadership is lost in a fool's fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a "family intervention," with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama's exponentially accelerating agenda for "fundamental change" toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama's radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don't shrug and say, "We can always worry about that later."

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.

______________________________________________________

More and more credible analysts are predicting that the United States could collapse in a Soviet-style breakdown within the next few years. In such a scenario, the vacuum of power created would leave the door open for the imposition of an even greater tyranny than we are witnessing today with Obama’s big government Socialist agenda.

It is far more likely that a military coup, even if it began as a genuine effort to “restore the Constitution,” or “solve the Obama problem,” would be hijacked and transformed into an effort to subjugate the entire country under a militarized police state to an even greater extent than it is now.

The more probable scenario is the one that was outlined by Tommy Franks in a 2003 interview with the men’s lifestyle magazine Cigar Aficionado, where a military form of government would be implemented in the aftermath of a huge terror attack that kills millions.

Franks predicted that another mass casualty terror attack would occur that would cause the “population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event. Which in fact, then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution.”



CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO MAIN PAGE................or HERE TO GO HOME